คู่หูขวางนรก ตลอดกาล

เรื่องย่อ

ไม่ว่าเวลาจะผ่านพ้นมานานสักกี่ปี มันก็ไม่ได้มีผลสะท้านสะเทือนอะไรกับมิตรภาพอันแน่นแฟ้นของคู่หูสุดซ่าต่างขั้วระหว่างเพลย์บอย ไมค์ โลว์รีย์ (วิลล์ สมิธ) กับแฟมิลี่แมน มาร์คัส เบอร์เน็ตต์ (มาร์ติน ลอว์เรนซ์) เลยแม้แต่น้อย พวกเขากำลังจะกลับมาร่วมงานกันเป็น "ครั้งสุดท้าย" เพื่อจัดการกับบุรุษตัวร้ายที่แส่มาหาเรื่องพวกเขา

คะแนน

8 รีวิว

• 

  itsogs

  9 6 เม.ย. 2563

  Another action packed movie for fans of bad boys.

• 

  tmdb92312096

  5 31 ก.ค. 2563

  You know what you're getting.

• 

  Subbu Swaroop

  24 ต.ค. 2564

  It was very fun and entertaining to watch. I was laughing all the time.

• 

  GenerationofSwine

  1 11 ม.ค. 2566

  Yeah....... IDK. I thought the first one was brilliant, and the second was an OK action/comedy but didn't have as many subtle spoofs, but still was a decent action movie. This one, on the other hand I'd only give one star because I do an all or nothing thing... but it was better than Lethal Weapon 4 wasn't it? It was better than Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. It was better than Coming Two America. It was better than most of the made it far too late where the original cast was far too old sequels that plague Hollywood like remakes. It lacks the action fun that II had, it lacks the layers of humor that I had, Martin looks like he couldn't be bothered to get in shape... but it was a lot better, a LOT better, than like films. So I guess I'll give it 10 stars because if Hollywood is going to make a sequel way too late for a sequel, this is sort of how you would want them to do it. There's nothing I can say I really love about it, but there is also nothing I can say I hate about it, and for a sequel that should either have never been made or should have been made a decade earlier, it's not a bad film. And that sort of makes it great in today's everything is humorless and political era.

• 

  Andre Gonzales

  6 22 เม.ย. 2566

  Not as good as the others. Martin Lawrence's character just didn't seem like he gave a 100% of his role in this movie. Kind of thrown off the chemistry they once had. It was still an ok movie.

• 

  Andre Wilfred Sanders

  5 2 ก.ค. 2568

  **Bad Boys 3: A Fun but Forgettable Ride That Lacks Its Old Spark** The question on my mind is: What are you doing? Sometimes, simplicity is golden—it doesn’t need complications. Take the Bad Boys series, for example. for note Watching this latest version doesn’t require seeing the previous films. I didn’t like the movie at all, though it has its funny moments. Some scenes are amusing, but not laugh-out-loud hilarious. The action sequences are straightforward, reminiscent of 90s films, but I realized that such scenes need a strong director who truly understands action. That’s not to say the action was bad—it was decent—but it could have been much better. I suspect this film will divide audiences. Some will love it, while others will dismiss it as mediocre. The chemistry between Will Smith and Martin Lawrence is still solid, but the movie doesn’t leave a lasting impression. The heroes have aged, and it shows—they lack the energy they brought to the first two films. Martin Lawrence tries hard to deliver humor, and Will Smith still has the physicality, but neither matches their peak performances from the earlier installments. There’s even speculation that a stunt double handled some of Smith’s faster-paced action scenes. The direction has many flaws, which made me lose enthusiasm for future Bad Boys movies. The biggest issue, however, is the weak storyline—it felt like watching a low-budget Indian action flick. The director approached this as a purely commercial project, with little thought put into it, which was disappointing. After watching this, I suggest Will Smith fire his agent and hire a new one. Lately, his film choices haven’t been great—case in point, Gemini Man (2019).