สัตว์มหัศจรรย์: อาชญากรรมของกรินเดลวัลด์

เรื่องย่อ

"Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald - สัตว์มหัศจรรย์: อาชญากรรมของกรินเดลวัลด์" การเดินทางครั้งที่ 2 ในโลกเวทมนตร์ชุดใหม่ของ เจ.เค. โรว์ลิ่ง เรื่องราวจากตอนจบของภาคแรก พ่อมดมืดผู้ทรงพลัง เกลเลิร์ต กรินเดลวัลด์ (จอห์นนี่ เด็ปป์) ถูกจับกุมโดย MACUSA (สภาเวทมนตร์แห่งสหรัฐอเมริกา) ด้วยความช่วยเหลือจากนิวท์ สคามันเดอร์ (เอ็ดดี้ เรดเมย์น) แต่กรินเดลวัลด์ก็ได้ทำตามคำขู่ของตน ด้วยการหลบหนีจากที่คุมขังและเริ่มรวบรวมเหล่าสาวกซึ่งส่วนใหญ่ไม่ได้สงสัยในจุดประสงค์ที่แท้จริงของเขา... นั่นคือการยกสถานะของพ่อมดแม่มดเลือดบริสุทธิ์ให้ขึ้นปกครองเหล่าประชากรมนุษย์ที่ไร้พลังเวทมนตร์ เพื่อขัดขวางแผนการของกรินเดลวัลด์ อัลบัส ดัมเบิลดอร์ (จู๊ด ลอว์) ได้ขอความช่วยเหลือจากอดีตนักเรียนของเขา นิวท์ สคามันเดอร์ ซึ่งตกลงรับภารกิจนี้โดยไม่รู้ถึงอันตรายที่รออยู่เบื้องหน้า เมื่อโลกเวทมนตร์เกิดการแบ่งแยกรุนแรงขึ้นเรื่อย ๆ ความแตกแยกก็ปรากฎชัด ขณะที่ความรักและความซื่อสัตย์ถูกทดสอบแม้กระทั่งในหมู่เพื่อนฝูงและครอบครัว

คะแนน

8 รีวิว

• 

  trineo03

  17 ธ.ค. 2561

  First of all, just like in the last movie the acting in this film is excellent but with a few exceptions. Eddie Redmayne was still excellent as Newt but I think he did a better job in the first film. Same thing with Dan Fogler who didn’t seem as funny but useless and could have just been written out of this film. But I did really like Jude Law as a young Dumbledore and Joshua Shea who plays young Newt. Joshua played younger Newt so well that he actually looked like a younger version of Eddie. Jude Law brought the same kind of attitude towards Dumbledore that we all know and love. The special effects and set designs still looked marvellous. The creatures special effects just like last time were great and looked like if we saw them in real life that’s what they would look like. The sets looked directly like they got taken directly out of a history book. Now with this film being a sequel, you would think they would fix the problems they had in the last film but for this one, they didn‘t. The main thing that bugged me was Johnny Depp. He didn’t do a good job of playing the main villain. It could be because of the writing or just because of his acting. Next is all of the subplots. I counted there are around four of them. But seeing how I couldn’t really figure out the main plot one of those subplots could have been the main plot. The last thing is the pacing in this film. Some scenes just seemed like the plot stopped for this one scene that could have just been taken out. The entire film felt really slow and only in the action scenes did it seem to pick up. At least the music was good. In the end, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald just seemed like a cash grab film. I give Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald a 5.5/10.

• 

  Gimly

  3 10 ส.ค. 2563

  I re-watched the original _Fantastic Beasts_ today to prep for _Crimes of Grindelwald_ and it made me realise that the only reason I gave that first film a positive review was because of Queenie Goldstein. She's just **such** a sweetheart. Her character wasn't the **only** thing I liked about that movie, but without her, it still gets pushed down into Rotten. So when they took her in this one and first made her a rapist and then a Nazis, I was uh... Not exactly stoked. But that's a personal thing, and I try to, at least partially, put that aside and review on things like technical aspect. And in that Avenue, _Crimes of Grindelwald_ is an **abysmal** failure. This is not the outright worst film of the year, but it was definitely the worst one I've seen in cinemas for a long damn time. _Final rating:★½: - Boring/disappointing. Avoid where possible._

• 

  r96sk

  6 12 พ.ค. 2565

  Better than its predecessor, even if I still didn't really dig it. 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' has more of a vibe about it, especially early on, and is marginally better paced. Overall, though, I'm kinda split on how I feel about this second instalment. It is a definite improvement, and yet I don't have any noteworthy positives to share about it. The cast, despite names I like, are just so forgettable to me in this. As such, I don't feel like I can give it any more than a 6/10 rating - which feels harsh, but 7/10 feels too high. With that said, I still plan to check out 'Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore'. It just needs that little extra oomph and these would be films that I'd enjoy, so hopefully that 2022 release will produce.

• 

  Martha

  2 26 ก.ค. 2565

  Confused, lost, Johnny Depp always awesome. I think the days of me playing in the Harry Potter world are over.

• 

  GenerationofSwine

  10 14 ม.ค. 2566

  Well, there was one too many twists here and I only say that because it was unnecessary. The plot would have been cleaner if they just let that one go...and don't worry, you'll know what is being mentioned when you watch it. It would have worked in a novel, but in a screen play it just made it a bit messy and loose. And, unfortunately, that is what the critics are going to focus on. But then, J.K. is a novelist and it got a bit lost in translation from one writing style to another. But, beyond that you have a wonderful cast and the film as a whole is delightfully fun. Eddie Redmayne is once more the lead, and he does a decent job...but what is better is how generous both Johnny Depp and Jude Law were in the film. Each have, in their day, stolen a show or two. They are both fully capable of stealing the spotlight...but instead they took a step back rather than hogging any of the limelight and, as a result, it allowed for everyone involved to deliver a solid performance. It could have easily gone the way of a Russel Crowe film with Law and Depp involved...however they didn't do the Crowe-hog and because of that the film ended up with more balance than it should have with the unnecessary plot turn. In other-words, they helped bring it back from being truly over blown. So what do you get? You get to walk into the weird world of Harry Potter again, and that is always fun. You get adventure and mystery and, again, that is always fun. You get decent performances and a solid (if bloated plot) and you walk away entertained. It's worth viewing even if it is unbalanced. It's still entertaining and fun and, after all, that is the point of making a movie.

• 

  CinemaSerf

  6 2 ก.พ. 2568

  In order to thwart the evil "Grindelwald" (Johnny Depp) from creating his own Arian version of enforcers for the wizardly world, "Dumbledore" (Jude Law) drafts in his talented understudy "Newt" (Eddie Redmayne) to help him out. Unfortunately, their nemesis has recently escaped from high-security custody and so the Ministry needs help for their men "Abernethy" (Kevin Guthrie) and "Theseus" (Callum Turner) too. Perhaps if these three can join forces - at wands length - then they can track down the evil "Grindelwald" and his own young and disturbed protégé "Credence" (the all too sparingly featured Ezra Miller) who himself may be the last in a long line of pure-bloods. With all now set for a gripping and exciting vat and mouse adventure, I don't really understand why this didn't work. The ingredients are all there: the acting talents are formidable and the visual effects are genuinely impressive - but the film is completely flat. There's not an hint of passion or emotion throughout. Depp looks bored by the whole proceedings and though Redmayne tries to imbue his character with a sense of honourable mischief, even that comes across as dry and procedural. Perhaps just too much emphasis has been placed on the sophisticated look of the film? There's nowhere near enough of an anchor in the plot to keep anyone interested in the characters and instead I just found myself looking at my watch wondering if this had much longer to go. Funnily enough, this might have worked better if you'd just read it and imagined much of what's presented to us here - at least then you might have been a little more invested in the sinisterness of the threat. Instead, though, it's all just dull and doesn't really build on the antagonisms of racial prejudice and supremacy that obviously underpin this second feature. It does need to be seen in a cinema. It's grand cinematography - luckily they'd kept the set for "Hogwarts" and score from James Newton Howard give it some sense of occasion, but it's much like the first film and is very much a victory for style over substance.