Suture

Name: Suture
Director: David Siegel
Genre: หนังชีวิต, ระทึกขวัญ
Released: 1993-09-14
Duration: 1 h 36 min
Rating: 6.451
Cast: Dennis Haysbert, Mel Harris, Sab Shimono, Dina Merrill, Michael Harris

"A thriller where nothing is black and white."

A man named Clay flies into Phoenix for a reunion with his long-lost half-brother Vincent.

รับชมตอนนี้ ดูตัวอย่าง

นักแสดงนำ

Dennis Haysbert

Clay Arlington
Mel Harris

Dr. Renee Descartes
Sab Shimono

Dr. Max Shinoda
Dina Merrill

Alice Jameson
Michael Harris

Vincent Towers
David Graf

Lt. Weismann
Fran Ryan

Mrs. Lucerne
John Ingle

Sidney Callahan
Sanford Gibbons

Dr. Fuller (as Sandy Gibbons)

เรื่องย่อ

A man named Clay flies into Phoenix for a reunion with his long-lost half-brother Vincent.

คะแนน

6.5 / 10

41 รีวิว

1 ยอดนิยม

1 รีวิว

John Chard
7 8 เม.ย. 2561

Stitching that burning ring of fire. Suture is written and directed by Scott McGehee and David Siegel. It stars Dennis Haysbert, Mel Harris, Sab Shimono, Dina Merrill and Michael Harris. Music is by Cary Berger and cinematography by Greg Gardiner. Identity is the crisis can't you see - X-Ray Spex 1978 Suture is an unusual film that on the surface hangs its chief premise on a most ridiculous concept. Yet what is most striking about the film's heart and soul is that it embraces a number of staple film noir narrative threads. Photographed in spanking monochrome, and featuring an unnerving musical score, this surreal like play works with a cheeky glint in its eye as it challenges the viewer's perception of the unfurling story. Wrapped around a suggested agony of identity, Suture revels in films and styles of film making it is influenced by. Name checking them all is folly, but as the amnesia angle blends with surgical reconstruction, and the murder plot betrayal sidles up to the voiceover, other potent pics spring instantly to mind. And yet in a piece heavy on identity, Suture, in spite of its reliance on influences, does have its own identity, very much so. It's quite a debut from McGehee and Siegel, one that begs the question of why they didn't go on to greater things? Here they have great camera craft, with close ups, overheads and frame blends in action, while there's some striking imagery and noirville shadow play to take in as mood setting accompaniments. It could be argued that much of it is highfalutin, and that the philosophical probing is overkill, but the film remains unique and intriguing, if not as remotely thrilling as one hoped. 7/10