ล่องหนฆ่า

เรื่องย่อ

ชายล่องหนคืออดีตเจ้าหน้าที่ซีไอเอคอร์ท เจนทรี่ (ไรอัน กอสลิง) หรือเซียร่าซิกซ์ โดนัลด์ ฟิตซรอย (บิลลี่ บ็อบ ธอร์นตัน) อดีตหัวหน้าเป็นผู้ดึงตัวคอร์ทจากเรือนจำกลางมาร่วมงานด้วย เขาเคยเป็นนักฆ่ามือฉมังที่หน่วยงานส่งไปปฏิบัติภารกิจ ทว่าตอนนี้สถานการณ์กลับพลิกผัน ซิกซ์ตกเป็นเป้าสังหารและถูกไล่ล่าตัวไปทั่วโลกจากการสั่งการของลอยด์ แฮนเซ่น (คริส อีแวนส์) อดีตเพื่อนร่วมงานที่ซีไอเอผู้พยายามทุกวิถีทางที่จะกำจัดเขาให้ได้ แต่เจ้าหน้าที่ดานี่ มิแรนด้า (อนา เดอ อาร์มาส) จะคอยให้ความช่วยเหลือในยามที่เขาต้องการ

คะแนน

8 รีวิว

• 

  CinemaSerf

  5 22 ก.ค. 2565

  Well at least this latest Netflix effort gives us some eye candy in the form of the annoyingly ageless Ryan Gosling and a slightly hammy Chris Evans, but the rest of it is derivative even by their standards. We start with a young man being released from prison by "Fitzroy" (Tommy Lee Jones) so he can join an elite CIA hit squad. Named "Six" (Gosling), his first mission is straight out of the "Mechanic" (2011) only it's an erstwhile colleague that he is sent to eradicate. A task that proves remarkably simple but is accomplished not before, luckily for us, he is given a micro chip that illustrates his new boss "Carmichael" (an underwhelming Regé-Jean Page) is about as crooked as the day is long. There now ensues a series of long "John Wick" style combat scenes as try as this hugely well equipped CIA operation does, it simply cannot capture "Six". Desperate times call for desperate measures so "Hansen" (Evans) is drafted in to finally do the business by kidnapping the easily accessible niece of the now retired TLJ, and using her as leverage he tries a different tack. Wholesale slaughter follows and along the way some lovely buildings in Prague and Croatia become neat piles of rubble; the local citizens are dropping like flies sending those in the CIA PR department into spasms... Well you get the gist. The always over-rated Ana de Armas sports quite a colourful suit at the start, but as usual her contributions are pretty unimpressive; TLJ is nowhere near his best and the thing lurches on towards a really inevitable conclusion that stretched out the thinnest of plots and showed a really disconcerting image of a CIA completely out of control, running rampage - and that scenario isn't remotely plausible. There is plenty of car-chasing, gunfights and pyrotechnic displays but that's nowhere near enough to compensate for a pretty unremarkable script and an amalgam of stories we have seen done better elsewhere, many times before. That said, if you get a chance to see it during it's limited cinema run then I'd give it a go. On television this is just subscription fodder with A-list cows that you will instantly forget.

• 

  the_blueeyes

  5 24 ก.ค. 2565

  Seing this as another run to the mill Netflix release should not keep your hopes up. Netflix is where mediocre goes to congreate to the masses. We have another spy action movie amongst us. Last one before this was Kate, that was another bland action-spy movie. This offers absolutely NOTHING new to the table. We seen every trick this movie offer before. Over-skilled agents. Clever coreographed fight scenes, Trick tactics, agents with no names, An agency who elimintaes their own agents, expendable kill teams, plenty conspiracies and tons of action. But i have to say i enjoy Gosling alone in this one. He plays it cool. Its just shame that he is backed up with a script littered with clichés from start to end. We also have Ana De Armas who is fast becoming the new Tom Holland that appears everywhere. An actress that is milked trought the Hollywood system and spewed out to never be heard of again some day. But the movie is for sure a worthy popcorn flick with no expetations to give. On a entertainment standpoint it delivers.

• 

  MovieGuys

  4 14 ส.ค. 2565

  Anyone thinking the CIA is anything other than awful, should in my humble opinion, take a long look at their actual history. Anyway, putting aside the predictable effort to set up this nasty little three letter acronym as virtuous, there's not a lot going on here. Its your usual rather heavy handed, cruel, cynical, US action flick. Exposition is polished but then it needs to be, because there's not a lot else on offer that I can see. Suffice to say, instantly watchable and just as forgettable. So if you want simple action and can look past the not so subtle messaging, this is a marginally alright watch.

• 

  The Movie Mob

  6 19 ส.ค. 2565

  **Overall : The big-budget, big stars, and big action felt more like a knockoff of other action franchises than a success in itself.** The Gray Man is the result of putting a Fast and Furious movie in a blender with Taken or John Wick and Michael Bay. The outrageous action and super cheesy dialogue try to take itself as a serious spy movie. Don’t get me wrong-it’s not a bad movie. The fight choreography is pretty good, and the Gray Man boasts an impressive A-list cast. It is a decent generic action flick. But the goofiness of Chris Evans’ villain was almost at Batman & Robin levels. I really wanted to rate this movie a little higher (like a 3.5 of 5 or 7 of 10), but it just falls short.

• 

  r96sk

  7 5 ม.ค. 2566

  It's good stuff, but ought to have been so much more. 'The Gray Man' features all the ingredients to have become a quality movie. Unfortunately, it is simply 'just' a watchable popcorn action flick. That's not necessarily a criticism in itself, it's just that I had hoped for far greater. Ryan Gosling puts in an entertaining performance, his dynamic with youngster Julia Butters is reminiscent of his similar showing with Angourie Rice in 2016's 'The Nice Guys'. Chris Evans and Ana de Armas are noteworthy positives alongside Gosling. The worldwide vibe of the story is cool, while the action sequences - aside from one 'skydiving' scene - are satisfactory enough. I enjoyed the film thus have no real complaints, it just could've/should've been something more memorable.

• 

  Darkflame4

  8 14 ธ.ค. 2568

  The Gray Man (2022) is a highly entertaining, and to me, memorable thriller. I've rewatched it four times now, which is rare for me. The visuals and effects are (mostly) high quality, and heavily contribute to making the movie intense. All of this, however, doesn't make the film absolutely flawless. Some scenes feel visually cluttered, and the plot is similar to many other action/crime thrillers. To add on, the budget was $200,000,000 - very high for a thriller with the sole purpose of a few hours of entertainment. Most films of this quality cost less than $100,000,000 to make. Overall, this is a very entertaining movie with awesome visuals (applies to most scenes) and intense action sequences, but does contain a mediocre plot and has an unnecessarily high budget. Worth at least 1-2 views for all action movie fans.