If You Should Leave Before Me
Mark and Joshua, a married couple, face a devastating loss that strains their relationship. To escape grief, they focus on their unconventional jobs as guides for the recently deceased, leading them to the afterlife.
Mark and Joshua, a married couple, face a devastating loss that strains their relationship. To escape grief, they focus on their unconventional jobs as guides for the recently deceased, leading them to the afterlife.
Shane P. Allen
Mark
John Wilcox
Joshua
Tom Noga
Gunter
Merrick McCartha
Lorne
Susan Louise O'Connor
Lily Boudreaux
LeeAnne Bauer
Unknown Woman
Vu Mai
Sarah
Brooke McCormick
Bonnie
Chris Pegut
Homeless Man
Mark and Joshua, a married couple, face a devastating loss that strains their relationship. To escape grief, they focus on their unconventional jobs as guides for the recently deceased, leading them to the afterlife.
How utterly disappointing it is to watch a film implode as it plays out, declining in quality with each passing frame the further one gets into it. Unfortunately, that’s the case with the debut feature from writer-directors B. Robert and J. Markus Anderson, a picture that admittedly starts out strong and engaging but that seriously goes off the rails as it unfolds, despite a few modestly successful attempts at redemption along the way. Mark (Shane P. Allen) and Joshua (John Wilcox) are a gay male couple who serve as case workers for the recently deceased, particularly when it comes to helping them address unresolved baggage from the lives they just departed that is holding them back from successfully crossing over to the next stage of their spirits’ evolution. They do this by crossing through portals that appear within their home, taking them to alternate realities where their clients are stuck. The premise is an intriguing one, to be sure, and the hindrances preventing forward progress that are explored early on in the film do a fine job of examining the kinds of issues that the newly dead may well face as they seek to transition. However, as this release progresses, it becomes bogged down by its own narrative, going off on overlong, arguably less relevant tangents that lack the crisp, insightful dialogue and sharp narrative arcs present at the outset. Shockingly, it even veers into territory that I found patently offensive, making me wonder what the filmmakers were thinking. Besides the picture’s central case worker plotline, it also delves into the emotionally charged relationship challenges of its two leads, but, regrettably, they tend to become overly talky, uninvolving, redundant and unfocused at times, despite starting out as a more engaging aspect of the film than all of the ancillary (and otherwise-easily excised) story elements. It’s almost as if the creators of this work loaded a huge pile of concepts into a hopper and threw it against the wall to see what would stick but not effectively eliminating anything in the process. Such a failing is frequently indicative of the work of first-time filmmakers who lack the experience and wisdom of recognizing the value (and need) of “killing one’s darlings,” no matter how much in love they might be with cherished but clearly superfluous cinematic elements. (Sadly, this even became apparent in a post-screening Q&A, when the directors as much as admitted there were ambivalencies in this offering whose existence and inclusion they couldn’t even explain themselves.) While I realize that there is a learning curve associated with the progression of a filmmaking career, it’s essential that new writer-directors recognize this and learn from it when they move on to subsequent projects. But, based on what’s in place here, it’s apparent this filmmaking duo has its work cut out for themselves going forward, particularly when it comes to incisively recognizing what’s important and what isn’t. To be blunt, my rating here is undeniably generous, as I was fully prepared to give it a lower rating while watching it unfold. However, for all of its faults, I must give kudos to this effort’s clever production design (effectively created on a virtually nonexistent budget), its inventive cinematography, a well-intentioned (if somewhat bungled) core premise, its snappy, moderately amusing dialogue (at least at the film’s beginning), and several heart-tugging sequences that help to rescue this release from its own misbegotten ways. But, when one factors in all of the material that should have been removed and that keep the film from otherwise succeeding, the result is a cinematic experience that’s thoroughly exhausting by picture’s end, a quality that nearly prompted me to leave it before the credits rolled.
A social butterfly who dies during her birthday week is given a second chance to right her wrongs on Earth.
ยอดชายฝีปากจรวด แจ็ค แม็คคอล (เอ๊ดดี้ เมอฟี่) ที่พูดได้สารพัดเพื่อให้ตัวเองได้ประโยชน์ แต่หลังจากที่เขาไปพูดพล่อยๆกับปรามาจารย์กูรูผู้หนึ่ง แจ็คพบว่าชีวิตของเขาขึ้นอยู่กับต้นไม้วิเศษที่มีใบไม้ 1 000 ใบ ซึ่งแต่ละใบจะหลุดร่วงไปกับคำทุกคำที่ออกมาจากปาก เวลานี้แจ็คต้องหยุดพูดและใช้วิธีบอกใบ้ในการสื่อสาร ถ้าหากไม่อยากตายไปพร้อมกับต้นไม้ใบโกร๋น! มาดูกันสิว่าทำไม A Thousand Words ถึงได้หรรษา ชวนให้อารมณ์ดีและมีครบทั้ง นักแสดงชั้นยอด มุขตลกชั้นเยี่ยม และเปี่ยมด้วยความสนุกตลอดทั้งเรื่อง
When George and her colleagues get a new boss whose focus is on moving souls quickly and enjoying life without consequences, the team begins to break the strict reaper rules. While her friends fall victim to their desires for money, success, and fame, George breaks another rule by revealing her true identity to her living family.
The year is 1955, and a great flood is coming to Northfork, Montana. A new hydroelectric dam is about to be installed in the mountains above the town, ready to submerge the valley in the name of progress. It is the responsibility of a six-man Evacuation Committee to relocate the townsfolk to higher ground. Most have duly departed, but a few stubborn stragglers remain – among them a priest caring for a sickly orphan, a boy whose fevered visions are leading him to believe he is a member of a roaming band of lost angels desperately searching for a way home.
A newlywed couple cancels their honeymoon and returns to the snowy Midwest to make the funeral arrangements for their best man, who died unexpectedly after their ceremony.
ภาพยนตร์เรื่องนี้บอกเล่าเรื่องราวอันน่าเหลือเชื่อของนักอนาคตศาสตร์ สถาปนิก และนักประดิษฐ์ R. Buckminster Fuller ผ่านทางวัยรุ่นสองคนที่หวังจะได้มีอะไรกับใครสักคน กลายเป็นเทพเจ้าพังก์ และเอาชีวิตรอดในโรงเรียนมัธยม
Hailey Freeman and her family are the last descendants of African American farmers who settled in rural Canada after the Civil War. In a famine-decimated near future, they now struggle to safeguard their farm, as they make one last stand against a vicious militia hell-bent on taking their 40 Acres.
วิล ใช้เวลาของเขาที่ด่านหน้าห่างไกลในการรับชมถ่ายทอดสดมุมมอง (พีโอวี) ชีวิตประจำวันของผู้คน จนกระทั่งคนหนึ่งหมดอายุขัย ทำให้มีที่ว่างบนโลก ในไม่ช้า ผู้สมัครหลายคน ซึ่งก็คือวิญญาณที่ยังไม่ได้ไปเกิด จะมาที่บ้านของวิลเพื่อเข้ารับการทดสอบความเหมาะสม และสูญสิ้นความทรงจำหากพวกเขาไม่ได้รับเลือก แต่ไม่ช้าวิลเผชิญกับความท้าทายในการดำรงชีวิตของเขาเองในรูปแบบของเอ็มม่า...
เด็กสาวคนหนึ่ง ค้นพบแผนที่ลับสู่โลกแห่งความฝันของสลัมเบอร์แลนด์ เธอจึงเดินทางข้ามความฝันและหนีจากฝันร้ายด้วยความช่วยเหลือของคนนอกกฎหมายสุดแปลก พร้อมความหวังที่จะได้พบพ่อที่จากไปอีกครั้ง
หลังสัมผัสประสบการณ์เฉียดตายเมื่อตอนยังเด็ก ดาร์บี้ ฮาร์เปอร์จึงมีความสามารถในการมองเห็นคนตาย