แกลดดิเอเตอร์ นักรบผู้กล้า ผ่าแผ่นดินทรราช 2

เรื่องย่อ

หลายปีหลังจากที่ได้เห็นการเสียชีวิตของวีรบุรุษผู้เป็นที่เคารพนับถืออย่าง แม็กซิมัส ด้วยน้ำมือของลุงของเขา ลูเซียส ถูกบังคับให้เข้าสู่สังเวียนโคลอสเซียม หลังจากบ้านของเขาถูกยึดครองโดยจักรพรรดิเผด็จการผู้ปกครองกรุงโรมด้วยอำนาจอันเหี้ยมโหด ด้วยความโกรธภายในใจและอนาคตของจักรวรรดิที่แขวนอยู่บนเส้นด้าย ลูเซียส ต้องหันกลับไปหาค้นหาความเข้มแข็งและเกียรติยศจากอดีตของเขา เพื่อคืนความรุ่งโรจน์ของโรมให้แก่ประชาชนของมัน

คะแนน

14 รีวิว

• 

  MovieGuys

  5 26 พ.ย. 2567

  Are you not entertained? Well, quite frankly, no.... Gladiator II or Gladiator lite as I like to call it is the "essentials" brand version of Gladiator. You know like, the "essentials brand" of underpants as opposed to known brands like Bendon or Jockey. They do the job, they're okay but still the brand names are just "better". Gladiator lite (II) mimics its predecessor but its predominantly just a bare essentials remake of a superior, original film. The story is a rather basic "almost" version of the year 2000 film starring Russell Crowe, the protagonists more or less fill the same or similar roles and well, that's about it. Oh but for a dash of difference, they do have CGI sharks, monkey's and rhino's, if, for whatever weird reason, that's your thing. In summary, this is really just a rather uninspiring "almost" facsimile, of a vastly superior, original film. Its not bad as such, its just feels like a beige re-run of sorts, that need not have been made.

• 

  Elif Duru Alaca

  9 27 พ.ย. 2567

  After many years, the sequel of the movie is really great, go to the cinema and watch it.

• 

  Chandler Danier

  4 14 ธ.ค. 2567

  Denzel is a badass. I love Denzel. He does the tongue thing from Joaquin's role in the first. Not even he could save this pile of crap. The CGI somehow is worse than the original. Historical battles are cool but not even historical battles could save this pile of crap. The Mandalorian is cool. Not even the Mandalorian could save this pile of crap. It's a pile of crap.

• 

  RalphRahal

  5 29 ธ.ค. 2567

  When Ridley Scott decided to revisit Gladiator, it sounded like an opportunity to expand on one of the greatest historical epics. Instead, we got a rehash that feels more like a missed opportunity than a bold sequel. The first act rushes through familiar territory. A general, born out of combat, loses his family and ends up as a slave. Sound familiar? It’s the same setup as Maximus’s story, minus the emotional weight. And sending Lucilla’s son away to protect him? That’s not just a weak plot point, it spits on everything Maximus and Marcus died for. The second act brings nothing new to the table. The “twist” is predictable, the plot messy, and the villains uninspired. Commodus worked because he was layered, a mix of insecurity and cruelty. Here, the two emperors are generic placeholders. Even the attempted coup feels like déjà vu, with none of the intensity or buildup that made the first movie iconic. The third act delivers a visually stunning battle but lacks substance. The final showdown offers nothing fresh, and the death of the antagonist in front of everyone feels like it’s trying to copy the original. The speech about “Maximus and Marcus’s dream”? We’ve heard it before, and it meant more the first time. What was the point of that last scene? There were so many ways to end this movie with a high note, something meaningful to honor Lucilla or Acacius. Instead, we get a hollow, pointless ending that adds nothing to the story. Credit where it’s due: the cinematography, CGI, and score are outstanding. Visually, the movie is a masterpiece, with breathtaking scenery and polished editing. The music, while clearly inspired by the original, carries the mood well. But great visuals can’t save a story that refuses to move forward. Gladiator 2 had potential, but it’s stuck trying to recreate past glory instead of delivering something new. It’s visually impressive but ultimately hollow.

• 

  FerdinandoLM

  4 4 ม.ค. 2568

  $250 million, and the best we get is… rabid monkeys? Ridley Scott’s Gladiator 2 feels like a parody of itself. Pascal’s character is utterly unnecessary, a cardboard figure who exists solely to fill runtime without contributing anything memorable or meaningful. D.W., despite his undeniable talent, is saddled with a bafflingly underwritten role, spouting clunky dialogue as the story collapses around him. As for the central narrative about Maximus Meridius’ son? Trivial and painfully predictable. The "legacy revenge" arc is telegraphed so clearly you could write the script after the first act. No twists, no depth—just a paint-by-numbers retread of the original’s emotional beats. Glory to Dondus indeed.

• 

  LuanBunyak

  9 ม.ค. 2568

  This is the story that answers how things went after the first movie. My hopes wasn't great for this part 2 but I was positively surprised. Its a great movie with lots of entertainment. 7/10