2000 Mules Backdrop Blur
2000 Mules Poster

2000 Mules

"They thought we’d never find out. They were wrong."

Bestselling author and award-winning filmmaker, Dinesh D’Souza, exposes widespread coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group, True the Vote, “2000 Mules” offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video. The geotracking evidence, based on a database of ten trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of professional operatives, called mules, delivering fraudulent votes to mail-in boxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence obtained from official surveillance cameras corroborates the cellular positioning data. The film concludes by exploring ways to assist in the prevention of election fraud in future democratic elections.

Top Cast

  • Dinesh D'Souza

    Dinesh D'Souza

    Self / Narrator

  • Catherine Engelbrecht

    Catherine Engelbrecht

    Self

  • Larry Elder

    Larry Elder

    Self

  • Eric Metaxas

    Eric Metaxas

    Self

  • Sebastian Gorka

    Sebastian Gorka

    Self

  • Dennis Prager

    Dennis Prager

    Self

  • Debbie D'Souza

    Debbie D'Souza

    Self

  • Gregg Phillips

    Gregg Phillips

    Self

  • Charlie Kirk

    Charlie Kirk

    Self

Overview

Bestselling author and award-winning filmmaker, Dinesh D’Souza, exposes widespread coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group, True the Vote, “2000 Mules” offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video. The geotracking evidence, based on a database of ten trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of professional operatives, called mules, delivering fraudulent votes to mail-in boxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence obtained from official surveillance cameras corroborates the cellular positioning data. The film concludes by exploring ways to assist in the prevention of election fraud in future democratic elections.

Rating

5.9 / 10
46 Reviews
0 Popular

3 Reviews

  • alexas
    alexas
    1 Jun 16, 2022

    Stop what you're doing right now. Go check FactCheck.org, Reuters, NPR, AP News, Washington Post, or any other fact-checker. **EVERYTHING IN THIS FILM IS FALSE!!!** GPS is not pinpoint accurate (anyone who has used Google Maps and seen their icon jump from block to block knows this). In court, it can only be used to identify you as being in a particular area. Ballot drop boxes are intentionally placed in high-traffic areas, like libraries, malls, or schools. In my case, it was across the street from the grocery store I walk to, right next to the library, perpendicular to a major road. Most people interviewed in this film refused to cooperate with independent fact-checkers. One that did attempted to show the GPS technique, only to be informed that his locations did not match up. At no point does this film show anything illegal. That begs the question: if the makers really did have proof of fraud, why didn't they submit it to the FBI, or even local authorities? (This is how 4 illegal votes *for Trump* were uncovered in the Florida villages) Seems kinda selfish that the makers would prioritize making money for themselves over bringing people to justice.

  • Adson68
    Adson68
    10 Sep 6, 2022

    A documentary showing one of the ways in which the 2020 US Presidential election was stolen, or "fortified" as it usually referred to by the perpetrators. This documentary shows how "mules" took advantage of unprotected dropboxes to flood the election with questionable ballots. It shows video footage and links that information to cellphone tracking to infer the routes travelled by the mules between dropboxes. The film features various prominent political commentators in conversation as they discuss the implications of the presented evidence. Of course, this documentary has been repeatedly attacked by propaganda outlets in a desperate attempt to stop people from seeing it. If you're a free-thinker, see it for yourself.

  • esoul
    esoul
    Nov 25, 2022

    The producers do not understand how to show that their claim "voter fraud" is true. You need to have premises(established facts) that connect with each other to then support the claim. However in this movie the producers are lacking evidence to even create the needed premises. So they start guessing and basically say "There is just no other possibility if you see whats happening". Well.... in pre school this logic might work, but in real life, as soon as you say "It cannot be any other way, because I have no evidence" you make a fool of yourself. The movie is worthless. Try the courts with it... will be fun.

Recommendations

Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism

This film examines how media empires, led by Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, have been running a "race to the bottom" in television news, and provides an in-depth look at Fox News and the dangerous impact on society when a broad swath of media is controlled by one person. Media experts, including Jeff Cohen (FAIR) Bob McChesney (Free Press), Chellie Pingree (Common Cause), Jeff Chester (Center for Digital Democracy) and David Brock (Media Matters) provide context and guidance for the story of Fox News and its effect on society. This documentary also reveals the secrets of Former Fox news producers, reporters, bookers and writers who expose what it's like to work for Fox News. These former Fox employees talk about how they were forced to push a "right-wing" point of view or risk their jobs. Some have even chosen to remain anonymous in order to protect their current livelihoods. As one employee said "There's no sense of integrity as far as having a line that can't be crossed."

Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism

7.0 2004
Primary

Primary is a documentary film about the primary elections between John F. Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey in 1960. Primary is the first documentary to use light equipment in order to follow their subjects in a more intimate filmmaking style. This unconventional way of filming created a new look for documentary films where the camera’s lens was right in the middle of what ever drama was occurring. Preserved by the Academy Film Archive in partnership with The Film Foundation in 1998.

Primary

6.5 1960