Beast

Overview

A recently widowed man and his two teenage daughters travel to a game reserve in South Africa. However, their journey of healing soon turns into a fight for survival when a bloodthirsty lion starts to stalk them.

Rating

8 Reviews

• 

  The Movie Mob

  6 Sep 9, 2022

  **Poor effects and mediocre writing obscure Beast’s shining moments.** Beast is a decent creature movie entry with some good actors and immersive camerawork. Unfortunately, the digital effects on the lion are distracting and prevent the tension from fully building. The film was at its best when characters were frantically trying to spot the lion before it attacked, but the attacks themselves were easily survivable, making the result disappointing. The pointless family drama, weak dialogue, and far-fetched man versus lion battles prevented Beast from being as enjoyable as movies like Crawl or Deep Blue Sea.

• 

  tmdb28039023

  1 Sep 13, 2022

  I think the key to figuring out this movie is an early scene in which one of the characters is wearing a Jurassic Park shirt. This must be the filmmakers winking their eye at the audience, letting us know that what we’re about to see is all in jest. How else to explain a film where the protagonists arrive in South Africa and immediately start bitching about the heat, but they’re all wearing jackets, and sweaters, and hoodies? More importantly, how are we to interpret a movie that introduces the issues of poaching (people who kill lions) and anti-poaching (people who kill people who kill lions, or at least that’s what Beast thinks it is), only to have the antagonist be a maneater (a lion that kills people regardless of their stance on poaching). This only perpetuates the myth that lions have never met a human they didn’t want to maul (while contributing nothing to the poaching debate). I’m not saying lions follow an animal version of the First Law of Robotics, but they do get a bad rap in the movies, as do sharks — and in that sense, Beast is closer to Jaws: The Revenge than Jaws. Actually, Beast is even worse than Jaws: The Revenge because the latter at least used a mechanical shark, as opposed to the former’s pitiful CGI lion. All things considered, this is a film that makes you yearn for the simplicity of The Ghost and the Darkness, which made no pretense of being anything other than a Hemingway-lite story about male bonding over hunting big game (and which, though taking many liberties with the source material, had the decency to feature real lions). Here, however, the hero tricks two other lions into killing the 'evil' lion, not only a gambit that could easily backfire, but also not very nature-friendly. Although coming to think about it, maybe these lions do comply with the second part of the First Law ("A robot [or in this case, lion] may not ... through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm").

• 

  thecrustycurmudgeon

  2 Sep 23, 2022

  **o.m.g - one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Please don't pay to see this film!** Idris Elba is generally mediocre anyway, but he can put on an acceptable performance with a decent script and concept. Sadly, neither was available to him in this bumbling, tragic, and failed effort to create dramatic cinema. I'm amazed that anyone could create a movie based on such a predictable and often used concept and do it so badly. One poorly contrived scene after another, belief is not just suspended, but abandoned entirely to piece together a cartoonish presentation of sappy ideas and bad cgi. The script is equally dreary, simplistic, and filled with mostly predictable chatter, until it suddenly leaps off the cliff of reality and into the void of astoundingly stupid. Sadly, that happens far too often. Don't bother going to the cinema to see this. Wait a few weeks for it to get relegated to Pluto TV, Amazon Prime Video, or Freevee. Honestly, it won't take long.

• 

  Nathan

  7 Oct 14, 2022

  _Beast_ had its moments where I was left gripping the arms of my chair at the edge of my seat, but the majority of film had me verbally laughing at the poor character writing. This movie does a lot right, don't get me wrong. The buildup to the encounter was done really well. You get a great introduction to all the characters and the individual struggles they go through due to the loss of Dr. Nate Daniels wife; it gives a baseline for the viewer to be able to relate and sympathize with the character. The action is pretty decent, and I was really impressed with the CGI work done on the lion. But, once the climax ensues the writing goes downhill, mainly in terms of character decision making. I found that the writers did not really know how to create unique situations to put the characters in with the lion, resulting in baffling decision to prolong the duration of the film. At every turn, a solution is so easily in view, but they do something that is such a right turn that it is unbelievable. The performance of Idris Alba really pulls the score up though. He does a fantastic job and portrays the loving and protecting nature of a father so well. I enjoyed his cool calm collected nature during high pressure scenes, it gave a sense of reality to him being a doctor. Overall, this film is not great, but it was entertaining, and I had a good time. **Score:** _65%_ | **Verdict:** _Decent_

• 

  r96sk

  6 May 10, 2023

  'Beast' is unfortunately a bit bland. Idris Elba's performance is fine, I'm a big fan of his so naturally expected a bit more from him here if I'm honest - his American accent is a tad distracting, but that's probably just because I'm used to his usual dulcet tones. Sharlto Copley is solid, while young actors Iyana Halley and Leah Sava Jeffries are OK; though their characters are written to act in an irritating way. The film could've done with a few more curveballs, most if not all that we see is pretty predictable - and even then it's all filmed and shot in a fairly 'normal' way. In short, this 2022 release didn't quite do it for me - it isn't bad, but I personally don't think it's anything good either. I'd say the beast special effect is decent, even if it was giving me more wolf vibes than lion. The middle/end improves upon the start, though all in all it's a quintessential 6/10 flick for me.

• 

  Marco-Hugo Landeta Vacas

  5 Mar 23, 2026

  (CASTELLANO) Ha estado bien. No inventa nada, pero tampoco creo que lo necesite. Es una de esas películas que cogen una idea muy simple —un animal convertido en máquina de matar humanos— y la exprimen con bastante oficio. En el fondo es eso: Tiburón, pero con un león cabreadísimo en vez de un tiburón, y con Idris Elba intentando sobrevivir en medio de la sabana. Lo mejor es que va bastante al grano. No se pierde demasiado en explicaciones ni en subtramas innecesarias. Plantea el peligro, mete a los personajes en la ratonera y se dedica a generar tensión con bastante eficacia. Hay momentos que son un poco absurdos, sí, pero forman parte del juego y la película más o menos sabe qué tipo de serie B quiere ser. También ayuda mucho Idris Elba. Tiene presencia de sobra para sostener una historia así, y eso hace que incluso cuando el guion se pone más básico o más inverosímil, la película no se venga abajo. No es un papel especialmente complejo, pero él le da la consistencia necesaria para que todo aguante. Visualmente está bastante bien resuelta. La sabana, los ataques, la sensación de aislamiento y algunas secuencias de suspense funcionan de verdad. El león a veces canta un poco más de la cuenta, pero en general la película sabe cómo usarlo para mantener la amenaza y no gastarlo demasiado pronto. Es verdad que el guion tiene agujeros, que algunas decisiones son discutibles y que todo es bastante predecible. Pero tampoco creo que venga por ahí su gracia. Su gracia está en ser una peli directa, tensa, simple y entretenida, de las que ves sabiendo perfectamente lo que te va a dar. En conjunto, me ha parecido una película entretenida, bastante eficaz dentro de su fórmula y con ese punto de “animal asesino” clásico que sigue funcionando cuando está bien llevado. No es nada del otro mundo, pero se deja ver muy bien. (ENGLISH) It was good enough. It doesn’t reinvent anything, but I don’t think it needs to. It’s one of those films that takes a very simple idea — an animal turned into a machine for killing humans — and squeezes quite a lot out of it with real craft. At heart, that’s what it is: Jaws, but with a furious lion instead of a shark, and Idris Elba trying to survive in the middle of the savannah. What works best is that it gets to the point quickly. It doesn’t waste too much time on explanations or unnecessary side plots. It sets up the danger, traps the characters, and then focuses on generating tension with reasonable efficiency. Some moments are a bit absurd, yes, but that’s part of the deal, and the film more or less knows exactly what kind of B-movie it wants to be. Idris Elba helps a lot too. He has more than enough presence to carry a story like this, and that means even when the script becomes more basic or more implausible, the film doesn’t collapse. It’s not an especially complex role, but he gives it the solidity it needs. Visually, it’s handled quite well. The savannah, the attacks, the sense of isolation, and some of the suspense sequences genuinely work. The lion looks a bit rough at times, but in general the film knows how to use it to maintain the threat without exhausting it too early. It’s true that the script has holes, that some decisions are questionable, and that everything is fairly predictable. And that may also be the film’s limit: it entertains, yes, but it doesn’t have much more to give. It has craft and knows how to tighten the screws in some moments, even if it never really leaves a mark. Overall, I found it to be an entertaining film, quite effective within its formula, with that classic killer-animal energy that still works when it’s handled well. It’s nothing extraordinary, but it goes down easily enough.